Posted in blu-ray, CES, HD-DVD, Intel®, IPTV, microsoft, Movie Download, Playstation 3, PLAYSTATION®3, prediction, prognostication, PS3, Sony, Technology, VHS/Betamax, Video, Warner Music, xBox 360, tagged hi-def on January 9, 2008|
1 Comment »
By now you’ve read about Warner Bros. Entertainment announcement to drop HD DVD and focus on Blu-ray, a Sony Corp. backed technology vs. rival Toshiba. Warner was the last major studio to put out movies in both formats and after May they will exclusively release on Blu-ray.
The announcement by Warner rattled the industry nerves to the point that the N.A. HD DVD Promotional Group (which included Intel and Microsoft) canceled a major media event. Who would blame them? It’s not the kind of exciting news for what’s to come in 2008!
I predicted Sony would not allow the “Betamax” struggle to repeat and that Blu-ray would prevail (HERE). No need to bore you with the technology advantages of each format. Ironically HD DVD has better interactivity today than Blu-ray, but that will evolve with BD Live. I also observed evidence of a move of desperation during the holiday season when Toshiba HD DVD players flooded the market at $179.99. Then Sony countered and jumped on the price discounting wagon with their BDP-S300 (entry level player) at Costco for $278.99 after a $100 rebate. A $100 premium and never mind it didn’t support 7.1 audio.
So what will Microsoft do now? Speaking to Reuters, Albert Penello, group marketing manager for Xbox hardware, said in response to a question about Microsoft possibly supporting a Blu-ray accessory if HD DVD failed that they would consider it. According to Engadget during holiday ’07 consumers purchased 92K HD DVD players for the xBox 360. I believe Microsoft really wants the market to shift to digital download (aligns with xBox 360 content download service and their xBox 360 IPTV directions) and the format war was likely viewed as a gift which stalled adoption, create consumer confusion while digital download services improve.
What is really important to most consumers is that the Warner announcement translates to the release of more movies which we want to watch (rent/buy) in stunning hi-def. Now that the format battle is over I can plan on the Blu-ray release of Lord of the Rings (LOTR). New Line (parent Time-Warner) will make this happen in ’08.
And if all this wasn’t enough good news for the week, Sony demoed at CES the “next generation” of portable cinema viewing. Samples of Blu-ray movies were successfully copied from a PlayStation 3 Blu-ray drive to a PlayStation Portable’s memory stick, as part of Sony’s new web-oriented service/approach to interactivity and play anywhere portability known as BD Live. Other abilities include ring tone downloading and other media content to a BD Live media player. One issue is that current Blu-ray players in the market (including the PS3) do not support BD-Live, but Sony confirmed the PS3 firmware update will be rolling out as early as this month to incorporate BD-Live playback into the system.
Now if Universal and Paramount can see that it makes sense (or is that $cents) to move to Blu-ray we’d be all set for a great hi-def year!
Read Full Post »
Posted in CES, Content Redistribution, Copyright, DRM, iPod/iTunes, Music, Oregonian, Piracy, Politics, Privacy, RIAA, Technology, VHS/Betamax, tagged CES, downloading, Music, RIAA on January 2, 2008|
Just days before the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) where legendary musicians and the buzz of new product introductions will showcase how consumers manage and enjoy their digital media “everywhere”, the Washington Post is reporting that the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has a federal case against Jeffrey Howell, an AZ, man who kept a collection of about 2,000 music recordings on his personal computer. RIAA maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer.
Huh? It’s illegal to transfer CDs to a computer? I thought court rulings over the last 20 years have found no violation of copyright law in the use of VCRs and other devices to time-shift TV programs; that is, to make personal copies for the purpose of making portable a legally obtained recording?
Who is RIAA? It’s an organization that represents the major recording labels in the USA. These labels pay multi-millions of dollars for this representation and since RIAA is based in Washington, DC., they act as an industry lobbyist, literally. They often urge, cajole or otherwise influence Congress to take their side in the “battle” against “music piracy.” I’m not sure who would visit, but the RIAA even ran a Holiday Anti-Piracy Campaign message streaming across its web site offering tips on “avoiding pirate products.”
And northwest news the Oregon State Attorney General and the University of Oregon are being assaulted by RIAA’s tactics. RIAA subpoenaed the University asking it to turn over the names of students that it suspected of making copyrighted material available to file sharers. Note the keyword here is suspected. While no one would disagree that it’s appropriate for victims of copyright infringement to pursue statutory remedies, shouldn’t that pursuit be tempered by basic rights of privacy and due process?
Typically RIAA harassment comes in the form of a pre-litigation letter to “suspects” they believe are guilty file sharers. There is even a credit card payment link – p2plawsuits.com where these so called “suspects” that receive the pre-litigation letters can drop off a quick $3000 to stop the RIAA from suing them. Maybe next up is payroll deduction options?! Good grief!
But that’s not good enough. RIAA is now running around with deep- pocket teams of lawyers saying that even making a personal copy on your computer is a violation. This hard-line position is clear. RIAA wants to roll back time to pre-internet days of vinyl albums. If you make copies of copyrighted music recordings – even on cassette tape – you’re stealing. You’re breaking the law and you could be held legally liable for thousands of dollars in damages.
The RIAA’s legal crusade against consumers (its customers) is a text-book example of an old media company clinging to a business model that has collapsed.
UPDATE: The Washington Post left out a couple of facts that are now being reported for the people who need to read all the details. Turns out the article was misleading in that the RIAA was not only going after Howell for ripping his CD’s, but for also putting those ripped files into a shared Kazaa folder. I disagree that because he put them in a shared folder its infringement, but its a different claim than the original one of just ripping them to his PC. It will be interesting to watch…
Read Full Post »
Posted in Climber, Drew Ann Rosenberg, Films, Follow the Profit, Kids, Movie Download, Technology, Tom Noonan, VHS/Betamax, Video on August 16, 2007|
1 Comment »
In May I attended a work function dinner up at Timberline Lodge. Upon arrival in the lodge parking lot it was clear that a film crew was in the middle of prepping and filming a movie. Not thinking much about it I walked around a bit and chatted with a couple ‘grips’ asking questions about what video editing software was being used, what camera’s, was it in hi-def, and then chatted with a couple girls that were stand in’s for the big “star”. I remember the weather being cold and they were standing with latte in hand shivering. At any rate, I’m just now getting around to looking up the details on the film.
Tom Noonan has just joined the cast of Follow the Profit. According to Variety, Robert Chimento, Diane Venora, David Conrad, Annie Burgstede, R.D. Call and Jonathan Frakes will also be starring in the independent drama.
The film revolves around an ex-Delta Force soldier who goes on a mission to save a group of abused youngsters. The impressionable kids are stuck in the clutches of an evil religious organization. Sounds like a yawn’er…,but I’ll go see it because I was there during some ‘B’ roll at the lodge.
The Drew Ann Rosenberg film starts shooting in Portland, Oregon this week.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Apple, Blogroll, blu-ray, CES, DVD, Format War, HD-DVD, microsoft, NPD, Playstation 3, Technology, VHS/Betamax, xBox 360 on December 12, 2006|
2 Comments »
There is a format battle brewing between the video-disc players and with no clear winner consumers are going to walk out of stores confused this holiday season and not buy anything.
This past weekend I stood in front of a 50 inch Pioneer Elite plasma, toggling between two 1080P stunning video’s with the absolute best and brilliant image quality offered from a video disc player. One is known as Blu-ray and the other HD-DVD. Before I explain how I walked out of the store dazed and confused about how an industry is doing a re-do (or is that Deja Voodoo?) of previous VHS/Betamax format mistakes…let’s back up some and cover a bit of the technical details.
Blu-ray and HD-DVD are new types of optical discs that provide better image and sound quality than standard DVDs. The discs are read by a tiny blue laser at a shorter wavelength than standard DVDs, which means more digital information can fit onto a single disc. The players retail cost is between $800-$1000.
Traditional DVD format manages a resolution of 720 x 480, for a total of 345,600 pixels. Blu-ray Discs for example can pack in a head spinning sum of 2,073,600 pixels for content recorded in 1920 x 1080 resolution. In case you don’t have a calculator handy, I’ll add it up for you: Blu-ray Discs are capable of six times the resolution of standard DVDs. Blu-ray’s higher bit rate also outshines regular DVDs at 10 Mbps and HDTV broadcasts at 19 Mbps.
Storage capacity: 25 GB (single-layer); 50 GB (dual-layer)
Data xFer Rate: 54 million (bits per second)
Industry Backers: Sony, Dell, Disney, Fox, Panasonic, LG, Phillips, Apple, MGM, Columbia Tri-Star, Miramax, ESPN, Touchstone, Pioneer, Samsung, Sharp, TDK, Thomson
Console Support: Sony Playstation 3
PC Support: Apple
Security: Mandatory HDCP encrypted output, ROM-Mark watermarking technology, BD dynamic crypto (physical layer) and Advanced Access Content System (AACS)
Storage capacity: 15 GB (single-layer); 30 GB (dual-layer)
Data xFer Rate: 36.5 million (bits per second)
Industry Backers: Toshiba, NEC, Microsoft, Intel, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros., HBO, New Line Cinema, Sanyo
Console Support: Microsoft xBox 360
PC Support: Intel
Security: Mandatory HDCP encrypted output (for HD), Volume identifier (physical layer), Advanced Access Content System (AACS)
The Consumer Electronics Association lowered (twice) their U.S. projected adoption rate for players this year from their hopeful robust holiday season of 600K units to only 200K units. These numbers don’t include video game consoles.
Speaking of gaming consoles, Sony expects to ship 2 million PlayStation 3’s (Blu-ray) by year end which is behind the 10 million shipments of Microsoft Xbox 360, however, very few Xbox 360 (1080i) units were shipped with the $199.99 add-on HD-DVD as it only become available in November. According to NPD, HD-DVD had out sold Blu-ray by 33 percent due to an earlier introduction and more vendors selling the hardware. And why does Microsoft put so much “puffery” behind how the 1080i picture will look identical to a 1080p picture? I’ll save details for another post, but trust me there is a difference between i (interlaced) and p (progressive). Historically, interlacing was first used in TV signals because CRT displays built in the 1940s could simply not work fast enough to draw every line in one-sixtieth of a second. So, has HD-DVD has won, correct?
Not so fast and back on topic. I suspect that a number of consumers are like me. Heads hurt and eyes roll because retail can’t promote the technology without confusion. There is no guarantee that top movies will be released on the format that I want. Not all movie Discs will be encoded at 1080p. I’m fearful of buying an expensive player that may well turn out to be worthless. Remember Laser Disc? And that really smarts…having a lot of $$ tied up in excellent content/movies that become unplayable due to MTBF rates (electronic gear built to fail) and your “format” is no longer supported.
And what’s behind that HD player pricing. For $200 I can buy the HD-DVD add-on for the Xbox 360 which is already attached to the HD TV or pay 3-5 times that amount for a standalone unit. Huh?! Or maybe I should just take the lowest common denominator approach and buy that $79 “up-converting” DVD player, and with all money left over pass out iPod’s like chewing gum stocking stuffers?
I’ve just said no, and will work really hard to convince to be happy and content with a low-rez DVD library for another year.
Read Full Post »